What are we rewilding for?
May 31, 2015
One of the primary objectives of rewilding* projects is the restoration of important ecological processes that have been lost due to the past extirpation of key members of the floral or faunal community. A main argument for species restoration within the rewilding paradigm is that humans are the main reason why these species were lost in the first place, and so we have a moral obligation to put them back. Other arguments focus on the expected ecological benefits of species restoration (typically large bodied herbivores), which include increased plant and invertebrate diversity, and nutrient cycling (e.g. bison restoration1). Yet, what if humans were not the primary, or direct, cause of species loss in the first place? Should that matter? Surely the benefits of species restoration will accrue regardless of the original cause of extirpation. Well, not necessarily, particularly if the original loss was due to an ecological cause that we have not yet fully understood and thus could not prevent from recurring once we have successfully released our long-lost fauna to their ancestral habitats.
Furthermore, how confident can we be that species (re)introductions will yield the expected positive benefits? The available scientific evidence suggests that the impacts of large herbivores on terrestrial ecosystems largely depends on the identity of the species involved and the current state of the ecosystem2. This is not an argument against rewilding. It is a call to those who wish to see rewilding projects succeed over the long-term to ensure that expectations of restoration outcomes are reasonable for the given ecological context. And if that information is not available? Well then be prepared for some ecological surprises.
*Rewild (google definition): to restore (an area of land) to its natural uncultivated state (used especially with reference to the reintroduction of species of wild animal that have been driven out or exterminated).
1 Knapp, A.K., J.M. Blair, J.M. Briggs, S.L. Collins, D.C. Hartnett, L.C. Johnson and E.G. Towne. 1999. The keystone role of bison in North American tallgrass prairie. BioScience 49: 39-50.
2Bakker, E. S., Knops, J. M. H., Milchunas, D. G., Ritchie, M. E. & Olff, H. (2009) Cross-site comparison of herbivore impact on nitrogen availability in grasslands: the role of plant nitrogen concentration. Oikos, 118, 1613-1622.
Also on the Blog...
Launch of the latest phase of the Local Ecological Footprinting Tool (LEFT) – 7th October 2016 – 5.00 – 6.30pm – Oxford Martin School
By Alistair Yeomans on October 6, 2016
We will be launching the Local Ecological Footprinting Tool (LEFT) on Friday 7th October in Oxford. This is the latest development phase of our web-based decision support tool for assessing ...
By Dr. Marianne Sinka on October 3, 2016
Our database of mosquito recordings is growing with considerable help from the CDC in Atlanta, Dr Sheila Ogoma at USAMRU-Kenya, Alex Fyfe at the Jenner institute amongst others; it now ...
By Henrik Hannemann on September 28, 2016
Preservation of biodiversity within Europe is widely acknowledged as an important goal not only for the intrinsic ...
By Herizo Andrianandrasana on November 27, 2015
Meeting my President at Chatham House in London was a day to remember for me! I am a Merton College final year DPhil candidate working with Professor Kathy Willis in the ...
By Dr. Elizabeth S. Jeffers on May 31, 2015
By Elizabeth Jeffers One of the primary objectives of rewilding* projects is the restoration of important ecological processes that have been lost due to the past extirpation of key members ...